@techreport{oai:suac.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000840,
 author = {四方田, 雅史 and YOMODA, Masafumi},
 month = {2011, 2013-09-03, 2013-09-03},
 note = {早稲田大学→静岡文化芸術大学, 経済史, 本研究は、産地における企業間協力や同業者組織から見た戦前期の日本と中国の違いを、いくつか事例を選んで比較・分析したものである。研究の結果、日本における産地秩序は、各産地の「声価」を維持・向上させることが主な課題となり、その「声価」は構成員にとって公共財的性格を持つと考えられたため、輸出品検査・商品取引所・同業者組織が生産者と政府の間の協力を通じて制度化されていった。対照的に、分析した上海では各生産者のブランドや商標を通じた個々の企業の評判に基づき、産地全体の声価という意識は希薄であった。そのため、日本では頻繁に見られたような協力的解決は上海では見られなかったと考えられる。, This research focused upon contrasting differences between prewar Japan and China in terms of inter-firm cooperation and trade associations in the producing districts. To conclude, Japanese industrial order tended to be based on inter-firm cooperation of which main issues were regarded as maintenance and reinforcement of "reputation" in each producing district. The reputation was regarded as public goods by its member, and therefore, export inspection systems, commodity exchanges and trade associations were established by cooperative behaviors among both producers in each industry and governments. In contrast, Chinese order tended to be based on reputation of each company through its own brands or trademarks, not of producing districts as a whole. Because it was not considered as natural that public goods, such as the above reputation and institutions, should be supplied by inter-firm cooperation, such cooperative solutions as often seen in Japan were hard to be found in Shanghai., 20730233},
 title = {輸出品検査と同業者組織の比較経済史 : 近代東アジアの「公」と「私」を中心に},
 year = {}
}